'They should finish their investigation, they should find out what happened in Bangladesh, they should find out who is liable there, they should give a copy of that to the Philippines government. 'That's why I think a report is not forthcoming,' Maria Celia Estavillo, RCBC's legal and regulatory affairs head, told Reuters. As many as six types of malware were used to infect Bangladesh Bank computer systems.Р”Р„ Bangladesh government-appointed panel said in May that Bangladesh Bank officials may have been involved in the brazen theft, but its report has also yet to be released. The initial FireEye report submitted to Bangladesh Bank in March and seen by Reuters had blamed a sophisticated third party for the attack and had identified around 35 'compromised' Bangladesh Bank assets. cyber security firm FireEye (FEYE.O) to investigate the February theft, saying the recovery of the money could be 'imperilled' if someone within the central bank was found responsible for the heist. RCBC has questioned Bangladesh Bank's June decision not to extend a contract with U.S. 'This truth is being deliberately withheld from the public domain so as not to allow the foreign perpetrators of the hacking to have knowledge of the investigations.' 'Bangladesh Bank knows enough about what happened from the internal and external reports so far obtained by it and others,' the central bank's lawyer Hossain told Reuters late on Saturday. It has said it may sue RCBC if other efforts to recover the money are unsuccessful. Most of the $81 million stolen is still missing and the culprits have not been identified, but Bangladesh Bank has held RCBC accountable for the loss. More than six months have passed since hackers broke into the Bangladesh central bank's computer systems in one of the biggest-ever cyber heists.